Mar 30, 2020


IV. God and his covenants (unconditional/non-negotiable and conditional aspects) (see IX.)


The concept of 'Covenant' (hebr. b'rit) is foundational for the study of Israel in Prophecy. God revealed Himself as the covenant-keeping God (I.A.7.). Although there is more than one covenant in the Bible, there is basically only ONE covenant, yet with different aspects revealed across time. The New Covenant "could just as accurately be referred to as the Renewed Covenant because it was nothing more than a renewal of both the Abrahamic and Mosaic covenants made with the house of Israel, carrying on the elements of both those covenants..., in which the Torah is written upon the believers' hearts.(Jer 31:33)" The different aspects of this covenant can be compared to a suzerain treaty (suzerain/vassal), a national constitution (sovereign/subjects), a marriage contract (Mal 2:14, see VII.B.1. bride/wife), a father-son relationship (see Exod 4:22; Hosea 11:1; Rom 8:29; Heb 12:5; Proverbs). [see Berkowitz. 1998, p. 40 and Berkowitz, HaYesod: FFOZ, 1999, L.7]

Since the concept of the Covenant is foundational in God's plan with Israel and leaves its trace through the Bible like a red thread tying together the history of salvation the reader is invited to consider the project of a Covenant Bible edition proposed by Robert Rand. Click here to see this alternative presentation of this aspect of Israel in Prophecy. Click here for his Preface.

God acts for the sake of His name, because of His faithfulness (see covenant relationship and jealousy, I.A.3.a-d.; III.A.; III.D.4.; IV.B.3.b.)

Click here (new window) to display all references, or click each individual reference below.
(Note: Each link opens a new window)

Reference Relevant Comments
Lev 26:44-45
Deut 4:27, 30-31
Deut 32:26-27
Ps 138:2
Isa 43:25 for My own sake
Isa 66:22
Jer 3:22; 30:11; 31:20, 35-37; 33:23-26; 46:27-28
Ezek 36:21-27 not for your sake ...but for the sake of my holy name
Hosea 11:8-9 For I am God, and not man -
Zec 2:8
Mal 3:6-7
Rom 11:28-29
Add Comment 
Sign as Author 
Enter code 253

gfwvfhveisa — 02 April 2013, 00:08

RvDDaj <a href="">jmcclibekfux</a>

Vhictoria — 31 March 2013, 05:33

Hey Jessica! I'm so happy you have a blog too! And I'm so happy that you are soon to be a Mrs.! An eternal maiagrre is the best and I'm so happy you found your eternal love!

mlirfux — 13 October 2012, 10:18

vu9UI2 <a href="">tasjqwgujdpf</a>

dgpkrkf — 11 October 2012, 16:32

oFjHry <a href="">jgffitdhizxn</a>

Bogdan — 11 October 2012, 03:42

Fascinating! How about a by-law that states a roof must be ietlalsnd correctly before sale, no matter what the material is. That would be my vote.After a leak last year, we discovered that not one, not two, but three roofs had been ietlalsnd on hour house. We have a flat roof. This had been done with county approval. Instead of fixing leaks, the previous owner had simply re-roofed over the leaks. For owners with flat roofs, think about the weight this adds to the house. We were told that if our area ever experienced a significant earthquake, this roof could collapse. The beams simply were not made to hold this much weight.There are no covenants or by-laws to govern experiences such as this. The County approved the previous roof installations. The inspector did not do roofs when the home was inspected prior to purchase, so we examined it ourselves.Now we have one brand new roof on our home, but for others, Buyer, beware.

smfdhqkr — 23 April 2011, 19:52

16vQoe <a href="">cseygmnuymbx</a>

khhqtigxgi — 20 April 2011, 23:33

1UNbgb <a href="">ajscgdgdlqgt</a>

China — 20 April 2011, 17:52

AFAIC that's the best awsner so far!